ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the publications and citations of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, so as to provide insights into improving the journal quality and impact.. Methods All publications were retrieved from 60 issues of 10 volumes of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, and publication and citation analyses were performed using a bibliometric method. Results A total of 1 867 articles were published in Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, with the largest number in 2012 (220 publications) and the lowest in 2020 (135 publications), and original article (36.48%), control experience (17.14%) and control study (10.34%) were the three most common article type. The overall proportion of grant-supported articles was 59.08% (1 103/1 867), and the number of grant per article was (2.34±1.58) grants. The mean duration from submission to publication was (173.48±105.84) days per article, and there was a significant difference in the mean duration from submission to publication among years (F = 30.883, P < 0.01). Jiangsu Province (492 publications, 26.35%), Shanghai Municipality (264 publications, 14.14%) and Hubei Province (230 publications, 12.32%) were the three most productive provinces where the first author lived, and disease control and prevention institutions were the predominant affiliations of the first author (67.22%), with Jiangsu Institute of Schistosomiasis Control, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Wannan Medical College as the three most productive affiliations. The number of authors was 5.94 authors per publication, and the proportion of co-authored publications was 95.45% in Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020. Journal article was the predominant type of cited (89.97%), and the mean number of citations was (15.70±11.56) citations per publication, with a significant difference in the mean number of citations per publication among years (F = 2.205, P < 0.05). The impact factors of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control ranged from 0.877 to 1.676 during the period from 2011 to 2020, and the overall Price index was 47.59%. Conclusions Both the academic impact and national transmissibility of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control appeared a tendency towards a rise from 2011 to 2020. Seeking high-quality contributions, increasing interdisciplinary integration, shortening the duration from submission to publication, expanding the coverage of publication services and enhancing impact are the future priorities of the journal.
ABSTRACT
Este artículo presenta un análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica de la Corporación de Estudios para Latinoamérica (CIEPLAN), el centro de estudios más importante durante la dictadura y transición democrática en Chile. El análisis se realiza sobre un conjunto de registros bibliográficos (n = 145), referencias (n = 4.055) e información biográfica de los autores, durante 1979-1989. Se analizan tres dimensiones: producción científica y áreas temáticas; colaboración y coautoría; y referencias o consumo de información. Se utiliza estadística descriptiva, modelamiento temático no supervisado y Análisis de Redes Sociales (SNA, por sus siglas en inglés). Los resultados muestran una tendencia constante en la producción científica y temas centrados en tópicos clásicos de la economía asociados con temas de desigualdad y política. Además, los análisis de colaboración y referencias muestran la existencia de una comunidad compuesta por reconocidos académicos y miembros de la élite política chilena centrales en la producción intelectual y en la red de referencias. Estos hallazgos permiten denominar a CIEPLAN como una de las principales comunidades epistémicas durante la recuperación y transición democrática chilena, en específico, durante los primeros gobiernos democráticos dónde varios miembros fueron reclutados para asumir importantes cargos en el ejecutivo. Hasta hoy, estos actores siguen influenciando el proceso de formulación de políticas públicas en Chile.
This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the Corporación de Estudios para Latinoamérica (CIEPLAN in Spanish) scientific production. This was the most important think tank during the dictatorship and democratisation in Chile. The analysis is carried out based on bibliographic entries (n = 145), references (n = 4,055), and biographical information of the authors from 1979 to 1989. Three dimensions are analysed: scientific production and topics, collaboration and co-authorship, and references or information consumption. We use descriptive statistics, unsupervised topic modelling, and Social Network Analysis (SNA). The results reveal a constant trend in the scientific production and classic topics of the economy associated with inequality and political issues. Moreover, the collaboration and citation analyses show the existence of a community composed of recognised academics and members of the Chilean political elite who were central in the intellectual production and the references' network. These findings allow us to name CIEPLAN as one of the central epistemic communities during Chile's democratic recovery and transition, specifically during the first democratic governments, where a number of members were recruited to assume important positions in the executive. To this day, these actors continue influencing the policy-making process in Chile.
ABSTRACT
No Enancib (Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação), o Grupo de Trabalho (GT)11 Informação & Saúde, criado em 2011, é responsável pelo estudo das teorias, métodos, estruturas e processos informacionais em diferentes contextos da saúde. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar trabalhos do GT 11 que apontam a bibliometria como seu aporte teórico-metodológico, de modo a conhecer algumas características de tal comunidade, ainda em bases quantitativas nesta etapa. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de abordagem descritiva e bibliométrica, com levantamento no Benancib (de 2011 a 2016) e nos anais dos Enancib (de 2017 a 2019). Para escolha dos termos, foi utilizado o Tesauro Brasileiro de Ciência da Informação. Encontraram-se 23 trabalhos, 40 autores, 60 palavras-chave e 385 referências. A vida média com base na obsolescência da literatura a partir de 2005 foi de 14 anos. Percebe-se que a bibliometria e os estudos métricos nos trabalhos do GT 11 são mencionados com frequência, o que poderia explicar as eventuais ausências de definição e discussão de tais métodos. Este estudo aponta a necessidade de combiná-lo com outras metodologias para contextualizar os indicadores apresentados.
In Enancib Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (National information science research conference), the Workgroup (WG) 11 - Information & Health, created in 2011, is responsible for the study of information theories, methods, structures, and processes in different health contexts. This article aims to present works of the WG 11 that point out bibliometrics as its theoretical-methodological contribution, in order to know some characteristics of that community based on quantitative studies in this phase. The research has descriptive and bibliometric approach, based on a search in Benancib (from 2011 to 2016) and in the annals of Enancib (from 2017 to 2019). The Tesauro Brasileiro de Ciência da Informação (Brazilian Thesaurus of Information Science) was consulted to select the terms. Twenty-three papers, 40 authors, 60 keywords and 385 references were found. The average life based on literature obsolescence from 2005 was 14 years. We can see that bibliometrics and metric studies in the works of the WG 11 are often mentioned, which could explain the possible lack of definition and discussion of such methods. This study points out the need to combine it with other methodologies to contextualize the indicators presented.
En Enancib Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (Reunión nacional de investigación en ciencias de la información), el Grupo de Trabajo 11 - Información y Salud, creado en 2011, es responsable del estudio de las teorías, métodos, estructuras y procesos de la información en diferentes contextos de la salud. Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar trabajos del GT 11 que señalan a la bibliometría como su aporte teórico-metodológico, con el fin de conocer algunas características de esa comunidad, aun en basis quantitativa en esta etapa. La investigación tiene enfoque descriptivo y bibliométrico, basado en una búsqueda en Benancib (desde 2011 hasta 2016) y en los anales de Enancib (desde 2017 hasta 2019). Para seleccionar los términos se consultó al Tesauro Brasileiro de Ciência da Informação (Tesauro Brasileño de Ciencia de la Información). Se encontraron 23 artículos, 40 autores, 60 palabras clave y 385 referencias.La vida media basada en la obsolescencia de la literatura desde 2005 fue de 14 años. Se observa que la bibliometría y los estudios métricos en los trabajos del GT 11 se mencionan con frecuencia, lo que podría explicar la posible falta de definición y discusión de tales métodos. Este estudio señala la necesidad de combinarlo con otras metodologías para contextualizar los indicadores presentados.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bibliometrics , Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators , Health Communication , Research , Information Science , Vocabulary, Controlled , Scientific and Technical Activities , Scientific and Educational Events , Search EngineABSTRACT
The impact of Alzheimer's disease on the population is signi?cant. Alzheimer's disease rose from the 25th most burdensome disease in the world. In order to identify depth and importance of the disease a scientometric study has been carried out. The study was carried out with the objective to examine the cited publications in Alzheimer's disease research and to examine the chronological growth of cited publications. The literature on Alzheimer's disease research data has been downloaded from 'Scopus', multidisciplinary online database, which is an international indexing and abstracting database, using the search term “Alzheimer's”. A total of 1,79,722 records have been identi?ed during the period of 1970-2017 (48 years). The study was carried out with the objective to examine the cited publications in Alzheimer's disease research and to examine the chronological growth of cited publications. Further study identi?es the authorship pattern of cited publications. The data were analysed based on trend of Cited publications; Citation and type of access; Yearwise growth; Block yearwise; Authorship pattern and Document type of cited publications. Nearly 85.3% of publications were cited and only 14.7% of publications were uncited. The study reveals that the citation of articles gets study increase every year during the study period and seems to be in linear trend. Nine papers out of 10 papers get cited irrespective of document type except short survey.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the overall layout of coronavirus genetics research in the past 20 years from the perspective of publication time, journals, keywords, citations and funds, identify core research institutions and their cooperation networks in this field, and explore current research hotspots.Methods:PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched separately for the research literature and citations data about coronavirus genetics from 2003 to 2021, and Excel was used to analyze the distribution of the literature and institutions, and then the Citespace software was selected for institutional cooperation network and reference co-citation cluster analysis.Results:The literature about coronavirus genetics had increased significantly in 2020. The top 10 journals have collected 23.4% of relevant literature. Chinese Academy of Sciences has published the most documents in this field, in the top 10 high-yielding institutions, 7 are from China. In the cooperation network, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Hong Kong and University of Sao Paulo have high betweenness centrality. The total litation times and average citation times of funded papers were higher than those of non-funded papers. There have been 7 research hotspots in the past 20 years. The research on " the gene sequence and functional receptors of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus" , " the gene traceability and drug development of the SARS-Cov-2" as well as " genotyping, origin and economic impact of paroxysmal porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States" are still active in the past five years.Conclusions:Coronavirus genetics research will be at a sustained high level in the next few years or even longer. It is difficult to publish papers in journals with high impact factors (IF>5.00) in related fields. Chinese research institutions are active in this field. The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the University of Hong Kong are the most influential, and they have the closest cooperation with other institutions. The genetic tracing, gene sequence and functional receptor of coronavirus and drug development are likely to be the forefront of the research in this field.our govermment should advance the layout in this field and increase the number of research funds and financial support.
ABSTRACT
RESUMEN El objetivo de este artículo fue realizar un estudio bibliométrico de las publicaciones de la RPMESP (2010-2019) con el fin de posibilitar el mejoramiento de los procesos de gestión editorial y toma de decisiones de esta y otras revistas científicas con similar comportamiento. Es un estudio descriptivo con metodología bibliométrica que analiza por medio de indicadores de productividad, colaboración y de redes las principales tendencias de la revista. Los registros fueron recuperados de Scopu, del cual, luego de un proceso de normalización, se obtuvieron 565 documentos. El 96% de documentos se publicaron en idioma español y en colaboración (dos o más autores), esto refleja que hay mayor interés de autores latinoamericanos de publicar en colaboración en los últimos años. Se observó un incipiente grado de apertura internacional al recibir documentos de países como Estados Unidos, Colombia y España, tendencia que es necesario continuar trabajando en la búsqueda de un mayor grado de internacionalidad. Perú como país y la Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia como institución tuvieron las mayores medidas de centralidad y poder en el análisis de redes. La posición estratégica de estos nodos puede ser aprovechada por la RPMESP para establecer estrategias y fortalecer relaciones de colaboración con todos los miembros de estas redes. Este paso podría mejorar el rol importante que cumple la RPMESP en la divulgación científica de estudios médicos en respuesta a las grandes demandas actuales.
ABSTRACT The objective of this article was to carry out a bibliometric study of the RPMESP publications (2010-2019) in order to enable the improvement of the editorial management and decision-making processes of this and other journals with similar behavior. It is a descriptive study with bibliometric methodology that analyzes through productivity, collaboration and network indicators the main trends of the journal. The records were recovered from Scopus, which, after a standardization process, obtained 565 documents. 96% of the documents were published in Spanish and in collaboration (two or more authors), which reflects the greater interest of Latin American authors in publishing in collaboration in recent years. An incipient degree of international openness was observed when documents were received from countries such as the United States, Colombia, and Spain, a trend that needs to be continued in the search for a greater degree of internationality. Peru as a country and the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia as an institution had the greatest measures of centrality and power in network analysis. The strategic position of these nodes can be used by the RPMESP to establish strategies and strengthen collaborative relationships with all members of these networks. This step could improve the important role that the RPMESP plays in the scientific dissemination of medical studies in response to the great demands of today.
Subject(s)
Periodicals as Topic , Bibliometrics , Social Networking , Peru , Public HealthABSTRACT
Resumen La presente investigación se propuso interpretar las razones que expone un grupo de investigadores para citar y descartar fuentes de información documentales y vivas. Para cumplir dicho propósito se realizó un estudio desde un enfoque cualitativo. Como técnicas se utilizaron la entrevista y el grupo focal de discusión. Los participantes en la investigación fueron doce investigadores activos, quienes aportaron la información en función de su experiencia y percepción subjetiva de la realidad. Los resultados se contrastaron con los criterios de fiabilidad y calidad de las fuentes de información expuestos en la literatura especializada. Entre los hallazgos más relevantes destaca la coincidencia en razones objetivas de selección y la diferencia entre las razones subjetivas de cada investigador. Por último, se presentan algunas recomendaciones para la selección de fuentes impresas y digitales, así como para la escogencia de fuentes vivas (informantes clave y expertos).
Abstract: The current investigation intends to interpret the reasons exposed by a group of researchers to cite and discard sources of live and documentary information. To achieve this goal, a study from a qualitative focus was carried out. Interviews and focal groups of discussion were used as techniques. The participants in the research were 12 active researchers, who provided the information based on their experience and subjective perception of reality. The results were contrasted with the reliability and quality criteria of the information sources exposed in the specialized literature. Among the most relevant findings, the coincidence in objective reasons of choice and the difference among the subjective reasons of each researcher stand out. Finally, some recommendations are presented for the selection of printed and digital sources, as well as for the choice of live sources (key informants and experts).
Subject(s)
Research , Bibliographies as Topic , Bibliometrics , Library Materials , Data Analysis , Data Management , Library Services , Science and Technology Observatories , Journal Impact FactorABSTRACT
Objective To bibliometrically analyze the citation characteristics of the papers published in Chinese Joumal of Trauma in recent ten years so as to provide the basis for further clarifying the academic orientation and improving the quality of the journal.Methods Based on the data from Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports (CJCR) and Chinese Science and Technology Papers and Citations Database (CSTPCD),the data system of Wanfang Database was used to analyze the citation of all papers published in Chinese Journal of Trauma in 2007-2016 by using bibliometric method.The type of the paper included editorial,case report,consensus and guideline,forum for expert,treatise,exchange of experiences,review,etc.The contents including messages,news and other column were excluded.Descriptive statistical analysis and evaluation were carried out on the citation,citation of a single article,distribution of the authors of the cited papers,subject distribution of the cited papers,high citation papers,core annual index,and the core influencing factors.Results In 2007-2016,Chinese Journal of Trauma published 3 249 papers,with annual publication volume of 254-361 papers (average 325 papers).A total of 2 452 papers were cited,with citation rate of 75.47％.The accumulated citation was 14 271 times,with average citation of 5.82 times and maximum citation frequency of 141 times.The authors of the cited papers were mainly from three source areas including Chongqing,Zhejiang Province and Shanghai.The main agencies were the Research Institute of Surgery,Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University and the People's Hospital of Peking University.The most three subjects of the cited papers were bone and joint injury (723 papers,29.49％),craniocerebral injury (396 papers,16.15％) and spinal cord injury (367 papers,14.97％).A total of 400 papers (16.31％) were cited over 10 times,of which the articles in Bone and Joint Injuries ranked the most,up to 124 papers (31％).In recent 3 years (2014,2015 and 2016),the core annual indices were 0.058,0.121,0.193 respectively,and the core influencing factors were 0.743,0.833,0.919 respectively.Conclusions The content of papers published in Chinese Journal of Trauma is closely concentrated on the trauma discipline,with relatively a high citation rate and high influence.However,there still lack the outstanding papers.The subjects of the cited papers and the units with high publication rate are rather concentrated,indicating an urgent need for strengthening topic selection planning to expand author group and sources of manuscripts.
ABSTRACT
Objective According to analyse SCI papers published by hospital faculties during the period of 2010-2015,this paper discussed influential factors and strategies for paper publishing from the perspective of hospital scientific research management,proposed suggestions to administrative department and leaderships for decision making.Methods Taking SCI database developed by Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) as data resource.Literature analysis method was used to analyze the SCI papers during 2010 2015 in terms of publishing amount,subject development,periodical distribution,foundation support,citation analysis,etc.Results The amount of the SCI papers increased sharply each year with a wide spread of extensive subjects which reveals the development of the medical research.However,the average Impact Factor of the paper is still struggling behind that of the top medical institutes.Most papers published in the hospital is supported by National Science Foundation of China (NSFC).Conclusions This paper proposed that the hospital needs to establish a series of policies to strengthen the project management and talent training in the long run,encourage publishing high quality papers to promote the development of disciplines,increasing the investment for constructing research platforms and also making good use of administration for better research.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify the 100 top-cited articles published in journals dedicated to acupuncture & moxibustion research and analyze their characteristics so as to explore its academic state.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>All the articles were collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, January 1, 1943 to December 25, 2016), Web of Science (January 1, 1950 to December 25, 2016), WANFANG Database (January 1, 1998 to December 25, 2016). The top-cited articles were selected and analyzed with regard to publication year, number of citations, journals, authors, country or region, institution, title, type and subject.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>One hundred and two articles were included, 43 Chinese articles and 59 English articles, cited between 146 and 505 times, and the average number of citation was 222. Of the 10 articles cited in the top 10, China and the United States had 4 articles respectively. These articles appeared in 44 journals, 24 articles in Chinese&, followed by 8 articles in. All the articles belonged to 9 countries and regions, 47 articles from mainland China and 21 articles from the United State. Of the 14 institutes whose article number ranked at top 10, Tianjing University of TCM had 8 articles. The first authors published most papers were professorand Cherkin DC, each of whom had 4 articles. All the articles were categorized into basic science article (n=27), clinical research (n=33) and literature study (n=42). The main topics were pain diseases and brain impairment.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>This analysis of high cited articles reveals academic trends and directions of acupuncture and moxibustion.and moxibustion are more and more recognized by mainstream medicine in the world, but the academic dominance of China has been increasingly challenged by the United States, Germany and so on.</p>
ABSTRACT
Indexation status matters for scholarly journal prestige and trust. The performance of Malaysian medical journals at the international level is gauged through the global citation databases, and at the national level through MyCite, a national citation indexing system. The performance indicators include journals publication productivity, the citations they garner, and their scores on other bibliometric indices such as journal impact factor (IF), and h-index. There is a growing consciousness amongst journal editorials to improve quality and increase chances of getting indexed inMyCite. Althoughitisnow possible to gauge journal performance withinMalaysia,throughMyCite, the government and public are concerned about journal performance in international databases. Knowing the performance of journals in MyCite will help the editors and publishers to improve the quality and visibility of Malaysian journals and strategise to bring their journal to the international level of indexation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To reveal the evolution, research hotspots and research fronts of clinical pharmacy services. Methods Documents related to clinical pharmacy services from 2000 to 2015 in Web of Science Core Collection database are included.Documents are visually analyzed through a number of co-citation maps, which identified the critical node documents in the revolution of clinical pharmacy services research by knowledge visualization tool, CiteSpace. Its functions of clustering and burst terms detection were also applied to analyze the research hotspots and research fronts. Results This paper determined the distribution of documents on time period, journals, countries and research institutions. Critical node documents perfectly showed the evolution pathway of clinical pharmacy services, main cluster groups and burst terms and documents, indicating the research hotspots and research fronts. Conclusion The research hotspots focus on 3 aspects.1 .Practice, including the service model and content of clinical pharmacy services;its interventions in diseases of emergency, organ transplantation, cardiovascular disea-ses and diabetes;surveys on developing clinical pharmacy services;genotype-guided individualized dosing;remote pharmacy serv-ices.2.Evaluation, including the assessment of the effects of pharmacists' interventions, service quality evaluation, and pharmaco-economic evaluation.3.Pharmacists' career development, including Pharmacists' training pattern, qualification, pharmacy residen-cy programs and job satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
The h-index is an objective and easily calculable measure that can be used to evaluate both the relevance and amount of scientific contributions of an individual author and field. The aim was to examine how the h-index of academic morphologists in Chile relates with academic rank. A descriptive and correlational study was design. We accessed the Chilean Society of Anatomy professor list in January of 2015, for analysis of academic morphologists' h-indexes using the Scopus database, and data was organized by academic rank. Also, m-Quotient was calculated. Institutional productivity was measured, and institutions were ranked on the basis of cumulative h-index, m-Quotient and the total number of publications and citations. For all morphologists analyzed, the mean h-index was 2.9±2.94 (range 012). The mean h-indexes were 1.9±2.135 for instructors, 2.5±2.54 for assistant, 5.1±2.89 for associate and 4.7±3.92 for professors. There was a significant relationship between h-index and academic rank (P<0.001). The m-Quotient were significantly different between assistant/associate and professors (P<0.001). By academic degree, the mean h-indexes were 1.0±1.92 for Bachelor, 1.6±2.0 for specialists, 2.3±2.26 for masters and 4.9±3.4 for Ph.D. The total number of publications for Chilean morphologist was 1343 publications (13.85±18.392), with 5321 citations (54.86±106.392). The top 3 institutions were Universidad de La Frontera, Universidad de Chile and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that h-index (P<0.001) and number of publications (P<0.001) were the best predictors of academic rank. There exists a significant relationship between h-index and academic rank, with h-index increasing with academic rank. It is a reliable tool for quantifying academic productivity within morphology, easily calculable and may be useful when evaluating decisions regarding advancement within academic morphology departments. These results should serve as benchmarks for future studies.
El índice h es una medida objetiva y fácilmente calculable que se puede utilizar para evaluar la importancia y cantidad de contribuciones científicas de un autor y área del conocimiento. El objetivo fue evaluar el índice h de morfólogos académicos en Chile, y su relación con la jerarquía académica. Se diseño un estudio descriptivo correlacional. Se accedido a la lista de profesores de la Sociedad Chilena de Anatomía en enero del 2015; para el análisis del índice h de los académicos morfólogos se utilizó la base de datos Scopus, y los datos fueron organizados por jerarquía académica. Además, se calculó cociente m. Se midió la productividad institucional clasificándose sobre la base de índice h y cociente m acumulados, y el número total de publicaciones y citaciones. Para todos morfólogos analizados, la Media del índice h fue de 2,9±2,94 (rango 012). Según jerarquía académica, se observaron índices h de 1,9±2,135 para instructores, 2,5±2,54 para asistentes, 5,1±2,89 para asociados y 4,7±3,92 para profesores titulares. Hubo una relación significativa entre el índice h y jerarquía (P<0,001). Los Cocientes m fueron significativamente diferentes entre los profesores asistente/asociado (mayor) y titulares (P<0,001). Según el grado académico, la Media de los índices h fueron 1,0±1,92 para licenciados, 1,6±2,0 para especialistas, 2,3±2,26 para magíster y 4,9±3,4 para los Ph.D. El número total de publicaciones para los morfólogos chilenos fue 1.343 (13,85±18,392), con 5.321 citas (54,86±106.392). Las 3 mejores instituciones fueron Universidad de La Frontera, Universidad de Chile y Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. El análisis de regresión logística multivariante demostró que el índice h (P<0,001) y el número de publicaciones (P<0,001) fueron los mejores predictores de jerarquía académica. Existe una relación significativa entre el índice h y jerarquía, al aumentar el índice h aumenta la jerarquía. El índice h es una herramienta fiable para cuantificar la productividad académica dentro de la morfología, fácilmente calculable y puede ser útil en la evaluación de las decisiones relativas a la promoción dentro de los departamentos académicos en el área morfológica. Estos resultados deben servir como puntos de referencia para futuros estudios.
Subject(s)
Publications/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Anatomy/statistics & numerical data , ChileABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: efectuar un análisis del impacto, mediante el conteo de citas recibidas, de la literatura cubana sobre ALFIN producida por autores cubanos durante el periodo 2000-2013. MÉTODOS: los trabajos citados se seleccionaron a partir de los 67 artículos presentes en la Wiki-Repositorio ALFIN/Iberoamérica-Cuba, mientras que los citantes fueron extraídos de la base de datos Google Scholar. Los indicadores bibliométricos aplicados fueron: citas por año, tipo de fuentes citantes, revistas citantes, autores y artículos más citados, y análisis de coocurrencia de términos. RESULTADOS: se identificaron 337 citas. Su crecimiento se inició a partir del año 2007, donde más del 50 % de los artículos publicados en cada año han recibido al menos una cita. La mayoría de las fuentes citantes fueron revistas científicas, en su mayoría latinoamericanas y del área de la Salud; la Medicina y la Bibliotecología y las Ciencias de la Información, en las que el 19,69 % de estas eran de la corriente principal. Fue alta la correspondencia temática entre los trabajos citantes y los citados, entre las que se destacaron como línea núcleo la ALFIN y las competencias informacionales en el dominio de la medicina y la salud. Esta tendencia también fue la más perceptible en los artículos cubanos más citados, a través de los cuales se visualizaron altos índices de citación para pocos trabajos publicados. CONCLUSIONES: el análisis del impacto de la investigación cubana sobre ALFIN aquí ejecutado muestra la gran relevancia que han tenido estos estudios, tanto para la comunidad científica nacional como internacional
OBJECTIVE: carry out an impact analysis of Cuban publications on INFOLIT produced by Cuban authors in the period 2000-2013, based on the number of citations received. METHODS: the papers cited were selected from among the 67 papers contained in the Wiki-Repository INFOLIT / Ibero-America-Cuba, and the citation sources were extracted from the database Google Scholar. The bibliometric indicators used were citations per year, type of citation source, citing journals, most cited authors and papers, and term co-occurrence analysis. RESULTS: 337 citations were identified. Their increase started in the year 2007, when more than 50 % of the papers published each year have received at least one citation. Most of the citation sources were scientific journals, mostly Latin American and from the areas of health, medicine, and library and information sciences, of which 19.69 % were mainstream. Topic correspondence between citing and cited papers was high, with a predominance of the central topics INFOLIT and information competencies in the domain of medicine and health. This trend was also the most perceptible among the most cited Cuban papers, showing high citation indices for few published papers. CONCLUSIONS: the impact analysis of Cuban research on INFOLIT herein presented shows the great relevance of these studies for both the national and the international scientific community
Subject(s)
Humans , Bibliometrics , Impact Factor , Information Literacy , CubaABSTRACT
The citations of original foreign language books in doctorial dissertations of Suzhou University in 2013 were analyzed,which showed that the number of cited original foreign language books on humanities and social sciences was greater than that on other science, the cited books were not limited to those that were recently published, the number of cited original foreign language books published by university press was greater than that published by other publishers. Suggestions were put forward for improving the acquisition of original foreign language books.
ABSTRACT
One hundred kinds of excellent books on basic medicine were selected from Wanfang Data Knowledge Platform to develop a books-papers citation database.Their academic levels of the selected books were evaluated by PageRank algorithm.The chapters and sections of the books were divided into 4 parts according to their PageRank value and the distribution characteristics of their citation frequencies to study the PageRank and the top 20 cited chapters and sections of the books.The advantages and disadvantages of PageRank algorithm in book evaluation were described.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the visualized citation of evidence in the research fields of clinical pharmacy. Methods: The visualized citation analysis tool HistCite was used, and science citation index-expanded core collections in Web of Science was applied to obtain the data. Biliometric analysis, citation analysis and visualization technology were used to investigate the number and year-dis-tribution, country and region, distribution of research institutions and core authors of the literatures in clinical pharmacy research fields. Results:During 2002 to 2013, the number of literatures of clinical pharmacy was increased year by year. The literatures were published mainly in 62 countries and regions, especially in the United States of America. The major research institutions were college of pharmacy in university. Conclusion: Over the past decade, the research on clinical pharmacy is increased rapidly. The software HistCite can reveal the development track of clinical pharmacy research fields quickly and visually.
ABSTRACT
Scientific researchers , medical and nursing staff in Academy of Military Medical Sciences and Chinese PLA General Hospital are the main readers of Medical Library of Chinese PLA.The papers they published in CMCI-covered journals from 2010 to 2012 and their citations were analyzed by citation analysis in order to find the de-mand of users and the use of literature in militarymedical journals , and discover the demand for biological literature information in scientific researchers and nursing staff in Academy of Military Medical Sciences and Chinese PLA General Hospital.The authors proposed that library holding journals should be evaluated with the support rate of highly cited journals and zero citation rate of library holding journals to guide the development of journal resources , provide evidence for the adjustment of resource acquisition , and perfect the library holding resources ofuser-ori-ented demand.
ABSTRACT
Caracterizar bibliométricamente la investigación cubana sobre alfabetización informacional (ALFIN), a partir de la literatura publicada desde el 2000 hasta el 2013. Métodos: se fundamentaron nociones conceptuales sobre la ALFIN en el dominio de la Bibliotecología y las Ciencias de la Información y también fueron exploradas algunas investigaciones que fungen como antecedentes de interés. A un grupo de 67 artículos identificados desde la Wiki-Repositorio ALFIN/Iberoamérica-Cuba se les aplicaron los indicadores bibliométricos de productividad por años, autores, revistas y análisis de coocurrencia de términos, así como también tipo de documentos citados y revistas y autores más citados. Mediante el uso de mapas bibliométricos y gráficos fueron presentados los resultados obtenidos. Resultados: a partir del 2007 hubo un alto crecimiento de la temática, y se destacaron como autores más relevantes los procedentes de instituciones del sector de la salud y la educación superior. Las revistas más productivas fueron las del área de la Bibliotecología y las Ciencias de la Información en Cuba. Se detectaron cuatro líneas básicas de investigación: 1) la ALFIN en las ciencias médicas y de la salud, 2) las competencias informacionales en estudiantes universitarios, 3) la evaluación de la ALFIN y 4) el diseño de programas de ALFIN. Los autores tendían a citar mayormente los artículos de las revistas ACIMED, Anales de Documentación, Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios, The Journal of Academic Librarianship y Ciencias de la Información. Los autores que mayor cantidad de citas recibieron fueron extranjeros. Conclusiones: en el estudio quedan esclarecidos los principales patrones de la investigación cubana sobre ALFIN, cuestión que no ha sido examinada anteriormente y que abre camino para el desarrollo de esta temática dentro de la Bibliotecología y las Ciencias de la Información...
Perform a bibliometric characterization of Cuban research on information literacy (INFOLIT) based on the literature published from 2000 to 2013. Methods: substantiation was provided for conceptual notions about INFOLIT in the field of library and information sciences, and some interesting research antecedents were explored. Sixty-seven papers identified by the Ibero-America-Cuba INFOLIT Wiki-Repository were examined with the bibliometric indicators yearly productivity, authors, journals and term co-occurrence analysis, as well as type of documents cited, and most commonly cited journals and authors. Bibliometric maps and graphs were used to present the results obtained. Results: the topic has expanded since 2007. The most outstanding authors were from health and higher education institutions. The most productive journals were from the area of Library Science and Information Sciences in Cuba. Four basic research lines were found: 1) INFOLIT in medical and health sciences, 2) information competences among university students, 3) INFOLIT evaluation and 4) design of INFOLIT syllabuses. The most commonly cited journals were ACIMED, Anales de Documentación, Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios, The Journal of Academic Librarianship and Ciencias de la Información. Overseas authors were more commonly cited. Conclusions: the study shed light on the main Cuban patterns for research on INFOLIT, a matter not examined previously, paving the way for the development of the topic in library and information sciences...
Subject(s)
Humans , Bibliometrics , Information Literacy , Research , CubaABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Analizar indicadores de producción y consumo de los artículos publicados en Odontoestomatología. MÉTODO: Se descargaron artículos completos en formato XML. Se relevó número y país de origen de los autores. De las referencias se registró: tipo de documento, modo de acceso, idioma, país de edición y año de publicación. RESULTADOS: 1.419 citas en 45 artículos: 78.2% a revistas; el núcleo Bradford fue 9, siendo la más citada el Journal of the American Dental Association (45). Un 37% cita revistas con suscripción paga, 24% en papel y 22% gratuitas en línea o papel. El idioma inglés tiene primacía abarcando Estados Unidos el 40% de las citas. CONCLUSIONES: 1) Preferencia por citar revistas, 2) Alta primacía por revistas de Estados Unidos y Europa y en idioma inglés, 3) Si bien las revistas de acceso pago son más citadas, se confirma un número alto de citas a acceso abierto, 4) El núcleo Bradford es de 9 revistas y se encuentran dentro de las 28 con mayor impacto (SCImago).
OBJECTIVE: To analyse production and consumption indicators from the articles published in Odontoestomatología. METHOD: Full articles were downloaded in XML format. The number of authors and country of origin were registered. Document type, access mode, language, country and year of publication were recorded from the references. RESULTS: 1.419 references are cited in 45 articles: 78.2% journals; Bradford core being 9 journals and the Journal of the American Dental Association was the most cited (45). 37% cite paid subscription journals, 24% paper access and 22% paper or free online. English language is foremost with the United States having 40% of cited journals. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Preference for journals cites, 2) High supremacy of United States and European journals and in English language, 3) Even if subscription journals were more frequently cited, a considerable growth in open access was confirmed, 4) Bradford core was 9 journals which are ranked within the 28 high impact ones (SCImago).